Helene
Ashleigh and Kailey
Anna S.
CLOSE RUNNERS-UP are Ethan VW. and Emma K!
Honorable Mention goes to Hannah BM, Rob, Ben, and Tristan and Ryan!
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D/F
|
Persuasiveness
|
Highly engaging hook and finale. You masterfully use recognizable, relevant, known, and
reliable sources.
|
Either the hook or finale could be more engaging. One of the sources comes from a
less-authoritative source.
|
Both the hook and finale
could be more engaging. More
than one of the sources comes from a less-authoritative source.
|
The hook and finale aren’t engaging, and the sources carry no authoritative
weight.
|
Flow/Structure
|
Thesis and topic sentences are masterfully matched and fit
together. Quotes or facts are
expertly embedded. Transitions
used cleverly. The entire essay
flows perfectly.
|
Thesis and topic sentences fit together with key words, but not
masterfully done. Transitions
used well, and quotes and facts are embedded.
|
There are evident thesis and topic sentences, but they don't all
cohesively fit together. More
than one of the transitions is awkward.
Some of the quote or fact embedding is awkward or missing.
|
Either thesis or one of the topic sentences is indistinguishable from
other sentences. The paper is
choppy, with no transitions.
Poor or little attempt to embed quotes.
|
PQE / Quality of
Analysis
|
Quotes/facts fully PQE'd, and there are clear, well-stated
connections to your topic sentences and thesis; the relevance of the quote or
fact is clearly evident.
The quote/fact is perfect evidence of point.
|
Most quotes/facts PQE'd, well-chosen quotes/facts that support the topic
sentences. The facts are easily
understood with the PQE. Quotes/facts are well chosen.
|
Quotes/facts are missing aspects of PQE, or quotes/facts don't
adequately support topic sentences. PQE. Quotes/facts are mostly well chosen, but one or two are
weak.
|
Quotes/facts are largely irrelevant or unintelligible, and there is
little attempt at PQE. The
quotes are generally weak, coming from unknown or unreliable sources, or just
don’t make sense or support your topic sentences.
|
Editing / MLA Format
|
No errors, perfect format.
There are at least three unique sources, and each parenthetical
reference matches a works cited entry.
|
Very few errors, perfect format.
There are at least two unique sources, and each parenthetical
reference matches a works cited entry.
|
Some errors, but evidence that paper is still edited. Some problems with format. There are
at fewer than three unique sources, or there is an inadequate reliance on one
source, or each parenthetical reference doesn't match a works cited entry.
|
Little evidence of editing or attention paid to format. Large problems with reliance on a
single source of information, or huge problems with matching references to
works cited.
|